diff options
| author | Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@darmarIT.de> | 2026-02-22 14:44:21 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2026-02-22 14:44:21 +0100 |
| commit | 191818b865b19270c8c38d905141356a6ba01d9a (patch) | |
| tree | b42ba81cc63263258688a124459dd08ecfa84e99 /setup.py | |
| parent | 5054e69844cbedfa0f5184955d662d944bcd35c1 (diff) | |
[mod] drop SearXNG's checker (#5767)
To date, there is no analysis for the checker that could be evaluated in any
meaningful way.
- https://github.com/searxng/searxng/issues/3407
- https://github.com/searxng/searxng/pull/3312
The checker would need to be completely redesigned, but even then, its
usefulness and the maintenance required for it would be disproportionate.
TBH: In its current form, it is useless and only consumes resources and
causes the engines to be blocked, because these tests (query terms) come
from *hundreds* of instances and could be interpreted as bot attacks.
Related issues: [search.checker](https://github.com/searxng/searxng/issues?q=label%3A%22search.checker%22)
Signed-off-by: Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@darmarit.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'setup.py')
| -rw-r--r-- | setup.py | 3 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 2 deletions
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ setup( ], project_urls={"Code": GIT_URL, "Issue tracker": get_setting('brand.issue_url')}, entry_points={ - 'console_scripts': ['searxng-run = searx.webapp:run', 'searxng-checker = searx.search.checker.__main__:main'] + 'console_scripts': ['searxng-run = searx.webapp:run'] }, packages=find_packages( include=[ @@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ setup( 'settings.yml', '*.toml', '*.msg', - 'search/checker/scheduler.lua', 'data/*.json', 'data/*.txt', 'data/*.ftz', |
